data science, digital politics, smart cities...|

The real component of virtual learning

Monica Bulger, Cristobal Cobo and I have a new paper out in Information, Communication and Society where we investigate real world meetings organised by MOOC users. These meetings are sort of contradictory as of course one of the advantages of MOOCs is that they are online and can be accessed anywhere without the need to travel; yet lots of users are kind of building in this face to face component themselves, all over the world (see the map). We asked whether this was because they felt they were missing something from the MOOC experience (and were therefore sort of recreating classrooms) or whether it was more of an excuse to network and socialise (hence recreating the after school social experience). We find evidence for both motivations though the former is stronger.

Meetup - Map

These meetings show important potential to fix one of the strongest criticisms of MOOCs, which is that they are only for the really self-motivated and that many people drop out: by creating local learning communities, perhaps motivation can increase. Yet this also cuts against the idea of global learning: it was clear, for obvious reasons, that most meetings take place in big cities in the developed world. Those in urban areas or developing countries simply have less people to meet with.

By |2015-07-28T08:48:14+00:00July 28th, 2015|Research, Social Web|0 Comments

Public Policy, Big Data and Smart Cities

I have just got back from the International Conference on Public Policy in Milan, where I was attending a stream of internet and public policy panels, as well as presenting a paper on explaining open data outcomes which I am currently working on together with some colleagues here at the OII. The conference itself was huge: in only it’s second year it attracted around 1,300 registrations, from across the policy sciences. Our sessions on the internet were quite well attended, though I didn’t feel like we attracted many people beyond those already interested in the internet.


I acted as discussant on a couple of panels on big data, with a particularly interesting one on smart cities. I think the smart city field is where public policy and big data overlap most closely: using big data to govern the city has already captured a lot of attention in both academia and policy itself, with examples of initiatives such as the Mayor’s Office for Data Analytics in New York or the Centro de Operações in Rio de Janeiro. It’s interesting to see the potential these places have for improving existing administration

It’s also worth highlighting all the challenges to smart city development, from opening data to getting the right skills in place. This is probably the reason why large cities which have created these kind of data “nerve centres” are leading the way, because they can overcome these obstacles in a concentrated way with direct support from the hierarchy. They raise the interesting possibility, furthermore, that they will become not just supporters of policy execution, but places where policy is set and defined. That would be revolutionary.

By |2015-07-10T08:14:57+00:00July 10th, 2015|Civic Technology, Research|0 Comments